[FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

[Pieter Steenekamp]

Just to continue; "your" article mainly addresses "antivaxxers". By no
stretch of the imagination can dr Robert Malone be categorized as an
"antivaxxer". He is the inventor of mRNA vaccination technology. He works
in this field, his purpose in life is to promote things very much
associated with vaccinations. It is very much against his self-interest to
point out limitations in mRNA vaccination technology.

My answer to your specific question is: if you connect the dots of dr
Robert Malone's explanations and you try to connect the dots of the
explanations in "your" article, I find his explanations more convincing.

I really don't have a problem if your connecting of the dots leads to a
different conclusion.

Unless you come up with a good reason to refute this, I'm not going to
discuss this further. How many times must we agree to disagree?


On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 23:03, Pieter Steenekamp <pieters at randcontrols.co.za>
wrote:

> dr Robert Malone explains how the Covid vaccine acts totally different
> than expected and different than all other vaccines. When a person gets
> vaccinated with other vaccines, there is a little bit of invection in the
> upper arm and the immune system kicks in, with "all the action" taking
> place in the area of the upper arm. On the other hand, with the Covid
> vaccine the vaccine particles, very unexpectedly, travels through the who;e
> body and "the action" is not limited to the upper arm area. Specifically a
> large concentration happens in the ovaries and that scares him very much.
> "Your" article reads like an "activists" article. Dr Malone's explanation
> sounds to me like a serious scientists
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 22:44, ⛧ glen <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> OK. What part of Malone's claims are not debunked? Again, I'm having
>> trouble knowing what you're talking about because you won't be specific.
>>
>> I'm fine with disagreeing. But I have no idea what we disagree about!
>>
>>
>> On June 18, 2021 12:36:28 PM PDT, Pieter Steenekamp <
>> pieters at randcontrols.co.za> wrote:
>> >Thank you Glen,
>> >
>> >I reread the article you posted
>> >
>> https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccines-are-going-to-sterilize-our-womenfolk-take-2/
>> >and then I listened to where dr Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA
>> >vaccination technology discusses the potential harm of the Covid
>> >vaccines:
>> >The long discussion has been removed, but the following two clips are
>> >still
>> >available:
>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_7E12VDE4 and
>> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Du2wm5nhTXY
>> >
>> >After reviewing this I came to the following conclusion:
>> >a) I 100% agree with "your" article in that it debunks many of the wild
>> >conspiracy theories. Thanks for this
>> >b) In "my" video clips, dr Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA
>> >vaccination
>> >technology, discusses carefully the potential harm of specifically the
>> >Covid vaccines. Refer to https://www.rwmalonemd.com/ for more about
>> >him. I
>> >don't find convincing arguments against these specific points in "your"
>> >article.
>> >
>> >Let me repeat, I am a VERY BIG fan of vaccinations in general and
>> >specifically of the mRNA vaccination technology. I am really excited
>> >about
>> >the potential benefits to humanity of this technology in that it could,
>> >in
>> >future, have effective vaccines available against viruses very soon
>> >after a
>> >new virus has been identified. Vaccinations have saved many lives the
>> >last
>> >half-century or so and mRNA vaccination technology could take the fight
>> >against virus infections even further.
>> >
>> >We all are confronted with data and information and we have to use our
>> >own
>> >judgement about what makes sense for ourselves. If you believe "your"
>> >article debunked what dr. Robert Malone said, fine, I am definitely not
>> >going to argue with you or try to change your mind.
>> >
>> >In my judgement, on the other hand, I don't find convincing arguments
>> >in
>> >"your" article debunking what Dr Robert Malone said.
>> >
>> >Again, I really appreciate your comments and I really do consider it,
>> >in
>> >general I value your judgement, but in this specific case I disagree
>> >with
>> >you. But at the end of the day we don't have to agree on how we
>> >interpret
>> >the information.
>> >
>> >Just on the cost, I was not referring to what it costs me personally. I
>> >was
>> >referring to the billions of dollars in taxpayers money big pharma got
>> >to
>> >develop the vaccines and the killing they now make to sell it to
>> >governments.
>> >
>> >About stirring the pot, in general I like to do exactly that, yes,
>> >guilty
>> >as charged. But in this specific case I am serious about seeking help.
>> >But
>> >please don't crucify me if we come to different conclusions on being
>> >presented with the same information. We can agree to disagree in a very
>> >positive spirit.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> glen ⛧
>>
>> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210618/966002e0/attachment.html>