[FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid vaccinations

[Pieter Steenekamp]

Thanks for the comment Glen. I might well have erred in claiming that my
criticism is also valid for traditional vaccines and not only mRNA
vaccines. I'll check this, and, to be honest, I sincerely hope you are
right and I made a mistake on this one.

On Sat, 19 Jun 2021 at 19:43, uǝlƃ ☤>$ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

> The y axis seems to be in "Total Lipid concentration (μg lipid
> equivalent/g [or mL])" from the table in the Japanese study. But the
> percentages data would make more sense to me. Attached is a log plot
> showing the percentages per tissue at 48h.
>
> Obviously, anyone concerned with this result should get a more traditional
> COVID19 vaccine: J&J, AstraZenica, Novavax, Merk, Sputnik V, etc. Pieter's
> citation of this data as part of a claim that alternative prophylactics
> like ivermectin are *better* than the TRADITIONAL vaccines is just confused.
>
>
> https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/jj-send-2-million-covid-19-vaccine-doses-safrica-by-end-june-president-ramaphosa-2021-06-15/
>
> On 6/19/21 7:56 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> > Remember that the spike proteins are anchored on the cells and that it
> isn’t resulting in replication.   It isn’t clear what the y axis refers to.
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Pieter
> Steenekamp
> > *Sent:* Friday, June 18, 2021 10:01 PM
> > *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam at redfish.com>
> > *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] The case for and the case against Covid
> vaccinations
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you Marcus.
> >
> > It seems like the authors of the study report you referenced and dr
> Robert Malone worked from the same data. See attached png file of a
> screenshot I made of the video where he discussed this issue.
> >
> > It's just that they came to different conclusions. The authors of the
> report you referenced are not concerned about it whilst dr Robert Malone is
> very concerned.
> >
> > From my perspective it's okay if based on this information, and
> obviously in the context of much other information, you are not
> concerned and I am.
>
> --
> ☤>$ uǝlƃ
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20210619/c2e587e9/attachment.html>