[FRIAM] The epiphenomenality relation

[⛧ glen]

As always, I'd argue that such things don't exist. There are no structures (or behaviors) with consequences that played no part in their development. So, as a counterfactual hypothetical, it could be fun to play such a game. But the burden is on the game master to persuade us why it might be a fun game. It looks useless or worse, encouraging of false belief, to me.


On November 25, 2021 10:39:18 PM PST, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> We
>will argue for a definition of an epiphenomenon as a consequence of a
>structure's (or behavior's) design which has played no part the development
>of that structure (or behavior).  
-- 
glen ⛧