[FRIAM] The epiphenomenality relation
⛧ glen
gepropella at gmail.com
Fri Nov 26 17:58:12 EST 2021
As always, I'd argue that such things don't exist. There are no structures (or behaviors) with consequences that played no part in their development. So, as a counterfactual hypothetical, it could be fun to play such a game. But the burden is on the game master to persuade us why it might be a fun game. It looks useless or worse, encouraging of false belief, to me.
On November 25, 2021 10:39:18 PM PST, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
>
> We
>will argue for a definition of an epiphenomenon as a consequence of a
>structure's (or behavior's) design which has played no part the development
>of that structure (or behavior).
--
glen ⛧
More information about the Friam
mailing list