[FRIAM] The comparative thickness of the tropospheree
Marcus Daniels
marcus at snoutfarm.com
Mon Apr 28 13:14:58 EDT 2025
I know. If small green bipedal creatures landed on earth and started tending to yardwork would that also be a disappointment?
They’ve failed to trim my tall hedge, so curse them!
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Nicholas Thompson
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2025 9:44 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] The comparative thickness of the tropospheree
Hi Marcus,
I find that George's indulgence with bad metaphor very useful.
I also find amazing his ability to grasp the gist of what I am asking. I have essential tremor and a bad keyboard and still George almost always gets the message. Siri will take any opportunity to misunderstand.
In this case, it was I, not George, who was cranking out the sloppy metaphors, trying to find a way to convey just how thin the atmosphere is. I was hoping Saran wrap thin, but that appears to be an order of magnitude too far.
Am I reading this wrong? people often talk about LLM's as if they are disappointed in them, as if there is something they SHOULD do that they aren't doing. Do you have any idea what the disappointment might be?: What is the world hankering for that they don't provide?
Nick
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 9:37 PM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com<mailto:marcus at snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
I wonder if the George makers 1) realized that people have an affinity to iffy analogies and they should give the people what they want, or 2) the LLM was prone to generating them so they just made it a feature?
From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com<mailto:friam-bounces at redfish.com>> On Behalf Of Nicholas Thompson
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 8:12 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com<mailto:friam at redfish.com>>
Subject: [FRIAM] The comparative thickness of the tropospheree
George and I were looking for intuition pumps to help a reader imagine how very thin the troposphere is. Here is what we came up with:
Ordered by Type: Too Thin → Best Match → Too Thick
Material / Object
Relative Thickness
Too Thin or Too Thick?
Notes
Weather balloon skin (fully inflated)
~280× too thin
Way too thin
Soap-film fragile
Plastic wrap (1 layer)
~7× too thin
Too thin
Would need ~7 layers
Eyeball tear film
~4× too thin
Slightly too thin
Very close, poetic comparison
Party balloon skin (inflated)
~3× too thin
Slightly too thin
Best easy everyday match
Troposphere
Apple peel
~14× too thick
Too thick
Best among fruits
Basketball skin
~16× too thick
Too thick
Similar to soccer ball
Soccer ball skin
~17× too thick
Too thick
Very close to basketball
Baseball leather skin
~25× too thick
Too thick
Heavier and thicker still
Tennis ball felt+skin
~37× too thick
Too thick
Very thick and fuzzy
Navel Orange peel
~70× too thick
Way too thick
Thickest skin we've discussed
--
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology
Clark University
nthompson at clarku.edu<mailto:nthompson at clarku.edu>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
--
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology
Clark University
nthompson at clarku.edu<mailto:nthompson at clarku.edu>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20250428/39322a54/attachment.html>
More information about the Friam
mailing list