[FRIAM] Complexity Returns to the Mother Church (or v.v?).

[Robert Holmes]

Randall Munroe says this better than I ever could

PHYSICISTS <https://xkcd.com/793/>

By the way Nick, you mentioned a physicist who set ethology back 50 years.
Who was it?

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:10 PM uǝlƃ ☣ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 10/12/18 3:46 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> > 5. ... From the strength of the triangle one can infer something about
> the parts that make it up, but from the parts themselves, lacking
> information about their arrangement, one cannot determine that the triangle
> will be strong.
>
> UNLESS! The information about how such parts *can* be arranged is
> deducible from the parts, themselves.  E.g. regular vs. irregular tilings.
>
> --
> ☣ uǝlƃ
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20181013/840ed7f2/attachment.html>