[FRIAM] More on levels of sequence organization

Frank Wimberly wimberly3 at gmail.com
Thu May 2 21:36:09 EDT 2019


I tried to copy this mail that had the file attached:

We used the  Hearsay-II extensively as a model for how to do parallel,
distributed applications in the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon.  It
makes use of levels and communication among them, up, down and within a
level.  Applications included factory automation, job shop scheduling, and
others.  As a speech-understanding system it was replaced by Harpy which
was faster.

Some will remember several other times that I have promoted this.  I'm just
trying to help.

-----------------------------------
Frank Wimberly



Phone (505) 670-9918

On Thu, May 2, 2019, 7:30 PM Frank Wimberly <wimberly3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> About levels.  I tried to post this but ran into the size problem.
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ynIauGuXsUgXvi8w0BuiY7VjfYrgGqgW/view?usp=drivesdk
>
>
> -----------------------------------
> Frank Wimberly
>
> My memoir:
> https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly
>
> My scientific publications:
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2
>
> Phone (505) 670-9918
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019, 5:36 PM Frank Wimberly <wimberly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We used the  Hearsay-II extensively as a model for how to do parallel,
>> distributed applications in the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon.  It
>> makes use of levels and communication among them, up, down and within a
>> level.  Applications included factory automation, job shop scheduling, and
>> others.  As a speech-understanding system it was replaced by Harpy which
>> was faster.
>>
>> Some will remember several other times that I have promoted this.  I'm
>> just trying to help.
>>
>> Frank
>>
>> -----------------------------------
>> Frank Wimberly
>>
>> My memoir:
>> https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly
>>
>> My scientific publications:
>> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2
>>
>> Phone (505) 670-9918
>>
>> On Thu, May 2, 2019, 5:24 PM Roger Critchlow <rec at elf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On the bounds of stupidity, there's at least a sucker born every minute,
>>> a large proportion of whom apparently benefit not at all from any kind of
>>> education.
>>>
>>> A theoretical sequential machine, perhaps, that might melt a hole
>>> through the earth while simulating a cell.
>>>
>>> The hierarchy in this case looks like linguistic compression to me, a
>>> way of summarizing results, the system is not depending on the levels of
>>> organization to work, we find levels convenient for explanations of how the
>>> system works.
>>>
>>> -- rec --
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:36 PM uǝlƃ ☣ <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks VERY much for posting some digested material from the paper.
>>>> What you say below seems to hearken back to what JonZ (or maybe JohnK?)
>>>> said awhile back, ... paraphrasing: that he would be hard-pressed to find
>>>> something that organisms can do that can't be duplicated by a sequential
>>>> machine.
>>>>
>>>> That type of statement and yours below do not *imply* that an effect
>>>> was NOT generated by a (semi)hierarchical structure. It merely implies
>>>> something like the parallelism theorem, that anything a (semi)hierarchial
>>>> system can do, a "flat" one can do (though perhaps with extra space or time
>>>> costs). Am I reading your statement right?
>>>>
>>>> On 5/2/19 12:02 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
>>>> > But they don't actually extract the levels of organization from the
>>>> model.  They take the levels of organization as known facts and construct
>>>> observations of the model that make predictions consistent with the
>>>> levels.  So if there are levels of organization as yet unidentified, they
>>>> are at least as obscure in the model as they are in reality.   And to claim
>>>> that the levels of organization emerge from the model sort of ignores how
>>>> much work went into constructing the observations.
>>>> >
>>>> > On the other hand, one might be surprised that all these levels are
>>>> implicit in the amino acid sequences, but life knew that already, that's
>>>> why it only remembers the sequences.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ☣ uǝlƃ
>>>>
>>>> ============================================================
>>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>>> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>>> archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>>> FRIAM-COMIC <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC>
>>>> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>>>>
>>> ============================================================
>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>> archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20190502/362b3dd0/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list