[FRIAM] Biden beats Trump

Robert J. Cordingley robert at cirrillian.com
Wed Nov 11 19:30:19 EST 2020


BTW, I worry smiling Pompeo wasn't in denial he was predicting a 'smooth 
transition to a second term'.

Meanwhile, PBS is showing the Rise of the Nazis see 
https://www.pbs.org/show/rise-nazis/. It took 4 years for the Nazis to 
destroy democracy.

-Robert C

On 11/11/20 4:11 PM, David Eric Smith wrote:
> So at some point, too, though, there are actual facts and things and 
> events in the world, which aren’t just cut from the fabric of human 
> impression and attitude.
>
> Suppose the following; as I was walking thisPM, after finally watching 
> the Van Jones TED that Glen circulated, it seemed quite believable to me.
>
> 1. Suppose what Van sketches is actually the plan.  Trump plans to 
> instigate a constitutional crisis.  I think he is capable of planning 
> to that degree of complexity and on that time horizon.  And I have no 
> reason in the world not to think Bill Barr would be down with the 
> lark, and could advise him on the law to do it.  I’m not sure Pompeo 
> has the same background, but in character I expect he would think it 
> is a great idea.
>
> 2. Then we wind up in congress.  He doesn’t have a huge margin; there 
> are only 26 republican representatives (or whatever the name is for 
> them).  So he really needs them all.  That’s what the last four years 
> has been for.  Figure out who has any other levers besides greed of 
> fear, and get them out.  Keep Graham and Cruz and all the rest like 
> them, who are amoral and predatory, and Collins and her ilk who can be 
> terrorized.
>
> 3. Suppose people decide to object, and want to take to the streets. 
>  Really a terrible time to have Esper running DOD.  He wouldn’t sic 
> the US armed forces on them.  So find some quasi-fascist brigadier 
> general who thinks might is not merely right, but Everything.  Of 
> course, you have to goad people and try to provoke them, so that the 
> lower-downs in the military will be willing to take orders, not 
> because they think the orders are moral, but because they feel 
> threatened and are trying to protect themselves and each other. 
>  That’s always how you co-opt soldiers.
>
> I look at the footage of old civil rights protestors, singing, 
> dancing, and clapping while being herded into paddy wagons, after 
> generations of abuse, and I cannot imagine a large cross-section of 
> Americans today with the discipline to do the same if provoked.  So 
> goading a few people into violence, and then using that to excuse a 
> military lockdown, doesn’t seem out of reach.
>
> Does anyone, anywhere, think the thing to make this unrealistic would 
> be trump’s getting cold feet or having qualms?  If so, then I think 
> that person is on the wrong side of a factual evaluation that has 
> nothing to do with values or character.  One of the two positions is 
> right.
>
> The rest is really a calculation.  How degraded are the other needed 
> actors, and how wide is the margin of error for the ones who would try 
> it?  There people could have opinions deriving from their own 
> characters or their beliefs in the characters of others, which I can 
> easily see disagreeing.  It also may not have a deterministic answer, 
> but boil down to accidents of circumstance.  So the disagreement could 
> reasonably reflect this too.
>
> Dunno.  If you can read enough news to know that S. Korea exists, how 
> can your intelligence lead you to believe either that trump and co 
> have done this well, or that if they haven’t it’s no big deal?  That 
> to me does not seem to be a question about ideology.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>> On Nov 11, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Stephen Guerin 
>> <stephen.guerin at simtable.com <mailto:stephen.guerin at simtable.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Marcus,
>>
>> Do you have close friend or family member with strong character and 
>> high intelligence that is also a Trump voter? My brother-in-law is a 
>> submarine captain. It was helpful to have a 3-hour call with him last 
>> night.
>>
>> I come away with the idea that his mental model is not opposed to 
>> mine...it's more of a dual to mine on which future Action can be 
>> defined :-)
>>
>> -Stephen
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:35 AM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com 
>> <mailto:marcus at snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Roger writes:
>>
>>     < These people weren't voting for rascism, misogyny, narcissism,
>>     authoritarianism, xenophobia, gimp shaming, science denialism, or
>>     all that other baggage, they were overlooking it for reasons. >
>>
>>     Many of those that could not work due to COVID restrictions are
>>     often in battleground or red states.   That’s the only way I can
>>     possibly begin to rationalize the 71 million.  To me, overlooking
>>     those things is unacceptable.   It’s not useful to exercise any
>>     empathy for them.   They made a deal with the devil.   It should
>>     have been a win by 50 million, not 5 million.
>>
>>     Marcus
>>
>>     - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
>>     FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>     Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>     <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,CPj5RuRiYhg7q-nY38eWb1AT5Sk6IaNukcEaUmKCV9xIhSg5LM3Iof_91RgVbA6ycxFl4lFkia0Tr8g6Q-21VxOXLRpEb3S2c-oQxgVSKQLWbApm1uHa&typo=1>
>>     un/subscribe
>>     http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>     <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,pFndxraHGPUTqCRMpab_Jllerhfp2xDQVLChPmSTSR6pOfRLVmjCJAt6XHsxfPJhBW6oAgJCcsHDaybaAhsuJUN2zPGa_dy0UMlVAhx4V9k,&typo=1>
>>     archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>>     FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>     <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,MrfUeTYjbHruA0xCS1tvtl6M-kVaPlCe7cQQmwzkL8s0r3oGhHsvbs5vcu5Mu2fsqpQgrpS7WuRzNLU0qn0J7K3ZKdydFYbcjn0Vy7J4FPo7rVoNlGNGSmA6QQ,,&typo=1>
>>
>>
>> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam 
>> <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
>> un/subscribe 
>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,ZNs4mwW3lJR1awqVISscUvnPyZnZLXx6LB6_uso-t58ASol7yEdWBGex2haikn6_2vH-PWfBWRWiFDpX1zpWKU0kaYQXYUQxQ2EewiuOMkGHqlM3cYMw&typo=1
>> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
>> FRIAM-COMIC 
>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,Lja_wcElDp2oLDpBPHsrOrAfksq4yi6b-wKF2l3k2PUxohz5FfRwflb98Qvk3NAjqKG-lYNswPyqKZGwZ9Wjliaj2zcCnVth2yR_n1THlY428AB9CsMZg54aVg,,&typo=1 
>>
>
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

-- 
Cirrillian
Web Design & Development
Santa Fe, NM
http://cirrillian.com
281-989-6272 (cell)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20201111/2c0c5842/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list