[FRIAM] Climate Science Denial: A rational activity built on incoherence and conspiracy theories | HotWhopper

[⛧ glen]

Well, at least we got rid of requirement #3. But I maintain that your requirement for logic is too ambiguous to defend. So if you'd drop that, we'd agree that "facts" are the only requirement for productive dialogue.


On November 25, 2020 4:11:33 PM PST, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
>Thou strawmanest me!
>
>If I am guilty of tautology it is believing that an argument is the
>offering of facts and logic (of some sort) in the hope of changing
>another's mind, or even receiving counter arguments that will change
>one's own. 

-- 
glen ⛧