[FRIAM] [EXT] News Alert: Most young men are single. Most young women are not.

Gillian Densmore gil.densmore at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 17:10:45 EST 2023


WTF, how are they coming up with these numbers? I know it sucks a whales
****** these days to make friends. Much less a GF (or BF).  But something
aint adding up here. Did they ask both people in the relationship?

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 3:04 PM Steve Smith <sasmyth at swcp.com> wrote:

> In a very limited and somewhat ad-hoc (latin hypercube of 10 samples of 5
> variables) ensemble study (100,000 samples) I did with an NREL colleague in
> 2019 using the World3 Model  we found a very ad-hoc observation that among
> the various ideas of what was a "good outcome" in 2100 (like GDP/person or
> other vernacular ideas of "quality of life") that virtually *all* of them
> involved a sooner-rather-than-later population collapse.
>
> To the extent that Modeling (in general), SD modeling more particularly
> and the World3 model in particular I wasn't very inclined to take the
> quantitative results of any of very seriously but it was an interesting
> (but unsurprising) qualitative result?
>
> For anyone interested in an interactive web implementation to dork with
> yourself:
>
>
> https://insightmaker.com/insight/2pCL5ePy8wWgr4SN8BQ4DD/The-World3-Model-Classic-World-Simulation
>
> FWIW I dorked around with it in honor of Jimmy Carter's recent admission
> to a hospice program... looking at what it might have meant if we'd
> followed his lead back around 1978.   Worth noting, I (foolishly by
> hindsight) helped run him out of town to be replaced with Ronnie Raygun
> ...   "drill baby drill, burn baby burn!"
>
> And an excerpt from a recent (2020) update synopsis of the Limits to
> Growth project/idea/model/results:
>
>
>
> <https://mahb.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/yale-publication-1.pdf>
>
> Worth noting:  The population drops in BAU/BAU2 (Biznezz as Usual)
> represent increased death rates rather than reduced fertility rates.
>
> The bigger (or smaller by another measure) question of what decisions
> anyone of us might make (for ourselves, our progeny, our friends, whatever
> policy-making is in our jurisdiction, in our imagination) is a much
> trickier one based on myriad principles/values that likely few of us share
> unless we choose a high dimension-reduction strategy (e.g. single-issue
> conception).    My parents were overtly ZPG advocates and I have one sister
> which lead me to feel plenty "done" after 2 children myself.   Each of my 2
> have chosen to only have 1.  Many of my friends have chosen to be
> childless.  Most of my peers who were from large sibling groups have at
> best a replacement cohort among their children and nieces/nephews which are
> headed toward a NPG in the following generation.
>
> My current heuristic is that if I want my grandchildren to reproduce, I
> need to get out of the way which means unless their other grandparents
> don't have the grace of knocking off by the time they want to do that, then
> it is up to me... no open-ended life-extension unless I expect to leave the
> planet (hear my pain Elon?)   I don't think the World3 has been updated to
> be a Sol model and even considering it really challenges the very
> structure/concept of the World3 SD model!
>
> Most of the population growth models I've run into suggest that we might
> be on our way to(ward) ZPG with many regions going into NPG, but not until
> we pass 10B.  I don't know that *any* of them factor in the non-linear
> effects of possible/likely runaway global warming or species collapse.
>
>
> On 2/22/23 11:53 AM, Santafe wrote:
>
> Yeah.  Bill Rees and Meghan Seibert want 90% of us to diehttps://www.realgnd.org/people
> (or a position paper somewhere in their writings).
>
> On their people page, you can see what happy ecologists they are, and BIll is a friendly old grandfather with a beard.
>
> I shouldn’t be snotty.  I think they are actually very tortured about their dictum that 90% of us should die.  And I think in some sense they are committed, good people.
>
> But I put them up here, because somehow people collapsing under decades of frustration seem to develop a misanthropy that causes them to forget It’s Not All About You (and how tortured you are, being the only truth-teller in a lonely world).  If you really care about the thing you say, then it should eclipse your own self-importance enough that you just stay focused on the task.
>
> I don’t know in how far their positions turn out to represent solid numbers.  Maybe some part of it.  But I have said that before.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2023, at 1:06 PM, Gary Schiltz <gary at naturesvisualarts.com> <gary at naturesvisualarts.com> wrote:
>
> A few really do want our species to go extinct, but many believe that we are already overpopulated and need to level off or reduce population. I lean only slightly toward the latter.
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:51 PM Frank Wimberly <wimberly3 at gmail.com> <wimberly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed.  But if we don't construct any new ones and the existing ones all die (they will) we will run out.  Is that a reasonable goal?
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:20 AM glen <gepropella at gmail.com> <gepropella at gmail.com> wrote:
> We do not need more people. We have plenty of people. Please stop constructing people. >8^D
>
> On 2/22/23 09:16, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>
> I am worried however.  I have two grandsons in their 20s.  Each has a girlfriend.  Those young women want nothing to do with babies.  I assume they have younger siblings.  I hope that as they enter their 30s their attitudes will change because of the realization that they are running out of time.
>
> ---
> Frank C. Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>
> 505 670-9918
> Santa Fe, NM
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 10:08 AM Santafe <desmith at santafe.edu <mailto:desmith at santafe.edu> <desmith at santafe.edu>> wrote:
>
>     I think the keyword was young.
>
>     You can do that if the old men are all married to young women.
>
>      > On Feb 22, 2023, at 12:02 PM, Nicholas Thompson <thompnickson2 at gmail.com <mailto:thompnickson2 at gmail.com> <thompnickson2 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>      >
>      > Last time I checked, the average number of attached males has to equal the average number of attached females, unless, of course, females, feel attached to men who don’t feel attached.
>      >
>      > Sent from my Dumb Phone
>      >
>      > Begin forwarded message:
>      >
>      > From: The Hill <thehill at email.thehill.com <mailto:thehill at email.thehill.com> <thehill at email.thehill.com>>
>      > Date: February 22, 2023 at 7:01:34 AM MST
>      > To: nthompson at clarku.edu <mailto:nthompson at clarku.edu> <nthompson at clarku.edu>
>      > Subject: [EXT] News Alert: Most young men are single. Most young women are not.
>      > Reply-To: emailteam at thehill.com <mailto:emailteam at thehill.com> <emailteam at thehill.com>
>      >
>      > 
>      > View Online
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > Most young men are single. Most young women are not.
>      > More than 60 percent of young men are single, nearly twice the rate of unattached young women, signaling a larger breakdown in the social, romantic and sexual life of the American male.
>      >
>      > Read the full story here.
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > Manage Subscriptions | Sign Up for Other Newsletters | Unsubscribe
>      >
>      > 1625 K Street NW, 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
>      >
>      > Copyright © 1998 - 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
>      >
>      > To ensure you receive these emails in the future, please add
>      > thehill at email.thehill.com <mailto:thehill at email.thehill.com> <thehill at email.thehill.com> to your address book, contacts or safe senders list.
>      > If you believe this has been sent to you in error, please safely unsubscribe.
>
> --
> ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
>
> --
> Frank Wimberly
> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz
> Santa Fe, NM 87505
> 505 670-9918
>
> Research:  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,ZhiIWlMw1mgxgv4ENlRIzwXDNqK9BEpMtjOD2JTJXOGVKjTuJdVkAnedajyZirHGAi9gL-6NIHGZx-tcyHhV0UEZyyaj3ibwUxM9_0BCK-6o2Ak,&typo=1
> to (un)subscribe https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,AAfBBp4dejU1uIoupaLmqEf5GR5ZQdPJudM-mxv0iFtQrwuFKZa8tfI9zKH2YmQyaBNCdL22pnV4fMi4iupFxC31suRZ3rcDDsY6hP64mfzw73dSCj6VGV5ZPoE0&typo=1
> FRIAM-COMIC https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,EN7xslIKPCpT6dYpD_tst8wGmwRHKJedUMFd0fNDjN_nCwALh9BuTwa-9FquPSkYBgOV-661rPGZCGa6x7KPDnyX7mxYNrPNqRegN6mh6kYikkVfWDg,&typo=1
> archives:  5/2017 thru present https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,_Zz1au4ID3Z0lXcvmobNtG0n8KhdQNLfqS5wat8_BG5nxRnmjveSmWceqX1I5GBZRQ1HNsRY3jJFZU1UN6fazZrfmFgMPCXCtGHeHe1zbfAQZZuTQA,,&typo=1
>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20230222/37b77401/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2023-02-22 at 2.42.44 PM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 225611 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20230222/37b77401/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Friam mailing list