[FRIAM] Application of robo-pigeon in ethological studies of bird flocks

[thompnickson2 at gmail.com]

Steve, 

 

No.  You are right on target for the thread.  My understanding of the present Government is that it is absolutely convinced that the centralist, technological, authoritarian model of government superior to other models and that this is their time to demonstrate that superiority.   I can really imagine some CCP leaders reading this research and thinking, “mmmmmmmmm!  THAT’S interesting.  In my back yard, back in the sixties, there was a teensy little CIA research station figuring out how to get animals –dogs, ravens, pigeons, donkeys, what-have-you, to carry bombs for them, using a combination of training and neural implants.  When the gave up the project, they left behind two gigantic glass carboys filled with pickled dogs heads.  

 

The Shadow Knows.

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com> ThompNickSon2 at gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> On Behalf Of Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 11:22 AM
To: friam at redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Application of robo-pigeon in ethological studies of bird flocks

 

Nick -



Chinese science moves ahead in the development of the ideal society. 

I don't mean to be flip in my question, but have to ask if you are being flip in this statement?  Can you say more about what you think the Chinese gov't/people/culture might be "trying" to do, either overtly, or implicitly by simply following their individual goals/interests/desires?    

I believe that the collective dynamics between Nations/Peoples are what is dominating the movement/evolution of humanity (cultural, not genetic) and that it is like an N-body problem in complexity and subtlety but is effected primarily through network relations.   

Like Gene Expression Networks, I believe that the more important "memes" (I think this is a useful but risky metaphorical binding that Dawkins coined for us most of a career (for me) ago) are those that are _regulatory_ which is why the likes of Trump and Bannon and Stone and the whole cabal of supervillians we are coping with these days focus on things like "fake news!" and "big lie!", etc.   In the spirit of McLuhan, "the medium IS the message", the medium itself becomes the _thing to manipulate_ like trying to disrupt the news credibility and the election process as well as becoming the definition of a tweetHole, and using Facebook to disseminate dysInfo etc.

I know this is an acute threadbend, you were trying to talk about birds and flocking and experimental techniques for studying same...  if you do feel inclined to answer, it is probably best to rethread.

https://jin.imrpress.com/article/2020/1757-448X/1757-448X-19-3-443.shtml 

If the robo-pigeon is a dominant member of the flock, you can make the flock do loop-di-loops by commanding the robo-pigeon to loop.  If subordinate, the loop-di-looping behavior of the robopigeon has no effect on the flock.  A robo-pigeon is one with a brain implant and pigeons are operated on AFTER their dominance in the flock has been determined. 

 

I hope I have this all right.  

Nick 





 
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20211111/cc4b05d6/attachment.html>