[FRIAM] new math of complexity

steve smith sasmyth at swcp.com
Thu Jun 13 15:50:06 EDT 2024


> In a similar vein:
>
> https://xkcd.com/2945/
>
> -- rec --

Russel Munroe is so prolific and self-documenting, I wouldn't be 
surprised if he hasn't (somewhere) documented/attributed the myriad 
influences:

Killer Rabbit of Caerbannog <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcxKIJTb3Hg>

>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 9:49 AM Marcus Daniels <marcus at snoutfarm.com> 
> wrote:
>
>     Simulate from first principles: https://www.vasp.at/
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> on behalf of Prof David
>     West <profwest at fastmail.fm>
>     *Sent:* Thursday, June 13, 2024 6:11 AM
>     *To:* friam at redfish.com <friam at redfish.com>
>     *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] new math of complexity
>     Naive, but honest question:
>
>     Can a computer program be "complex?"  Jochen seems to assert so,
>     /"Every developer knows that each piece of code which is added
>     makes the system more complex."/ I would say no, it only makes it
>     more complicated.
>
>     My answer is partially based on the fact that code must execute on
>     a deterministic machine and the code itself (at least its compiled
>     self) is nothing more than a virtual machine, still a
>     deterministic system. Even the source code is a context free
>     grammar, so none of the things that make natural language complex
>     (context sensitivity, metaphor, interpolation) prevail. Otherwise
>     the code would not work?
>
>     A secondary motivation for asking, I am working on an extended
>     monograph/book on how to intentionally 'evolve' complex systems
>     like a business and the software that supports it,or ULS (
>     https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/library/ultra-large-scale-systems-the-software-challenge-of-the-future/ ),
>     i.e., systems that *_cannot_* be "engineered."
>
>     davew
>
>
>     On Wed, Jun 12, 2024, at 5:30 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
>
>         Emergence as a kind of “software in the natural world"? If we
>         mean code by it, then yes, certainly. Every developer knows
>         that each piece of code which is added makes the system more
>         complex. Therefore we usually try to keep it simple. For
>         biological systems it is the DNA code. For cultural systems it
>         is the hidden code people do not want to talk about because
>         everything related to it is sacred (at least for the group
>         which it defines). The knights templar had their own code, the
>         order of the cistercians, the Franciscans and the other
>         religious orders and organizations as well.
>
>
>         Cults and sects have their code ( which can be simple
>         political slogans such as "Make Your Country Great Again",
>         "Build the wall" and "Lock them up" or simply "Do not
>         criticize the supreme leader"). Criminal organizations have
>         their code. Ideologies and political parties have their code.
>         Behind every complex organism or organization there seems to
>         be some form of code or DNA that generates and maintains it.
>
>
>         Whenever something is happening in nature it is either supper
>         or pairing time. Obviously  because the underlying "selfish"
>         code has created bodies which have the directive to maintain
>         and replicate themselves. If we look at cultural systems, for
>         instance at political conventions or at religious
>         congregations, then we notice that every time something is
>         really happening at a larger scale is that the code becomes
>         active. People come together to read or express laws, rules,
>         guidelines and policies.
>
>
>         So I would say yes, if there is a secret then it is the code.
>         Definitely. Is there a new math for it? IMO it is quite hard
>         to formulate the expression of such a code in general
>         mathematically. For example how can you describe
>         mathematically if the speech of a president or party leader or
>         priest has bigger consequences or not? It is at least as
>         complicated as calculating a path integral in Quantum Field
>         Theory.
>
>
>         What might be possible is to calculate a probability how a
>         group behavior changes depending how frequent a rule is read,
>         remembered and expressed.
>
>
>         -J.
>
>
>
>         -------- Original message --------
>         From: Roger Critchlow <rec at elf.org>
>         Date: 6/12/24 8:05 PM (GMT+01:00)
>         To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
>         <Friam at redfish.com>
>         Subject: [FRIAM] new math of complexity
>
>         Speaking of emergence, any takes on Phillip Ball's article in
>         Quanta?
>
>         https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-new-math-of-how-large-scale-order-emerges-20240610/
>
>         I really liked his summary of the current non-explanations for
>         emergence, but I haven't had time to read further.
>
>         -- rec --
>         -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>         FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>         Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>         https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>         to (un)subscribe
>         http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>         FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>         archives:  5/2017 thru present
>         https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>           1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
>
>     -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>     FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>     Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>     https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>     to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>     FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>     archives:  5/2017 thru present
>     https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>       1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>    1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20240613/46cd7ff6/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list