[FRIAM] Your personal truth
steve smith
sasmyth at swcp.com
Fri May 9 14:14:26 EDT 2025
The geometric metaphor/analogy oft used here to discuss LLMs (and othr
contemporary Generative AI?) is that of interpolation. While I am
compelled by this myself, (subsampling and gradient following on high
dimensional manifolds) I am also lead to believe/suspect that
topological interpolation/extrapolation, in the same sense as conceptual
blending is relevant? I haven't followed the original reference to
Hopfield's topographic metaphor but I'm vaguely surprised from what I
know of him that he'd not also invoke topology...
On 5/9/25 7:39 AM, Prof David West wrote:
> OK Nick, You asked for it:
>
> I totally agree with you.
>
> As I believe you do, I think metaphor is absolutely essential,
> generalizing a bit on Quine's statement "at the fringe of science only
> metaphor can guide us" I would replace science with understanding. But
> when it comes to the brain, Mind, Consciousness, and Intelligence—no
> one has produced a useful or even usable metaphor that increases our
> understanding.
>
> The only point of departure, is I would find less fault with
> anthropomorphism than I do with the computational metaphor that
> dominates the conversation about brain-mind-intelligence. Mary is a
> mere imp compared to that Satan.
>
> I do like Hopfield's metaphor of a topographic surface that channels
> "rainfall" (inputs) to "oceans" (outputs) as an explanation for the
> operation of one possible bit of "innards," i.e., a neural net.
>
> davew
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2025, at 5:16 AM, thompnickson2 at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Oh Gosh, Jochen. On the one hand I am deeply indebted to FRIAM
>> members for allowing me to noodle in areas of thought where I have no
>> business; on the other hand, I feel obligated not to hide from you
>> how very, very bad I think Mary C. Lamia’s thinking is. In the first
>> place, lover of metaphors that am, I think the anthropomorphism of
>> the brain is one of the most dangerous metaphors a human can bring to
>> psychology, because it sets off an eternal loop of thought from which
>> there is no escape. Meteorology and Psychology have much in common.
>> They both have to do with objects with innards operating in
>> environments. With Psychology, the objects are human, the innards
>> are the guts and brain, and the environment is the people and things
>> around us. In Meteorology, the objects are the storms, the innards
>> are the fronts and other structures of cyclones, and the environment
>> is the earth’s surface and the larger circulation of its atmosphere.
>> Perhaps I feel drawn to Meteorology just because it seems so like a
>> behavioral science. (Or, to get the order of events right, I was
>> drawn to Psychology because it was so like Meteorology.) But we
>> must keep our levels of organization straight. And if we, like Mary
>> C., are to make metaphors between the whole (the person) and the part
>> (the brain) and then to say that the part is manipulating the whole,
>> she ought to be damn clear what kind of metaphorical world she his
>> let herself into or she will never get out alive. I don’t think she
>> knows anything she is talking about. I would be terrified if one of
>> my college-aged grandchildren were to fall into the hands of such a
>> person.
>>
>> I am deeply sorry if I am being a jerk. (And will no doubt deeplier
>> sorrier when one of you points out both that I am both being a jerk
>> and that I am wrong). If you were tempted to carry on this
>> conversation further, now I have been a jerk, I would love to explore
>> with you how some aspect of Mary’s thought accorded with your
>> experience and perhaps gave you comfort or insight because of that.
>> When she talks of the brain, what is she actually talking about for
>> you. Because, if one thing is damned sure, it is that when people
>> talk about their brains, they are talking about something they have
>> never touched or seen or heard or felt. They are talking about a
>> beetle in a box, a nothing. Or they are using the brain as a model
>> of behavior.
>>
>> OK, Russ, Dave, Glen, Marcus, Erics, have at me.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> *From:*Friam <friam-bounces at redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 24, 2025 2:10 PM
>> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
>> <friam at redfish.com>
>> *Subject:* [FRIAM] Your personal truth
>>
>> If Nick shares his struggles with weather I can share my unqualified
>> thoughts about psychology :-P I was thinking about the orange menace,
>> how he deceives everyone and how he manipulates his followers by
>> controlling their emotions and I was wondering if emotions deceive us
>> in general. Do emotions deceive us by creating a reality distortion
>> field that paints the objects they have identified as desirable
>> (primarily food & mates for supper and pairing time) in the brightest
>> colors?
>>
>> Emotions certainly need to manipulate us in order to control us.
>> Their purpose is to influence our behavior and interactions.
>> Psychologist Mary C. Lamia writes "Without any deliberate effort on
>> your part, your brain evaluates every situation you encounter and
>> decides if an emotion should be activated to alert and protect you"
>> [1]. They are in a sense the PR machine and advertising agency of the
>> body. As if the body would create an advertising agency that
>> highlights the objects it should seek.
>>
>> Emotions deceive us because they exaggerate. If we are in love they
>> turn the desired object of person into some kind of wonderful dream.
>> We only perceive positive traits while negative ones are overlooked.
>> If we hate something we only perceive negative traits. These
>> distortions act on top of your beliefs which "create a cognitive lens
>> through which you interpret the events of your world" [2]
>>
>> They exaggerate to alert and protect us. Mary C. Lamia writes "By
>> creating anxiety, anger, sadness, fear, guilt, shame, disgust,
>> embarrassment, or any number of emotional responses that your brain
>> has at its disposal, your emotional system attempts to inform and
>> protect you by making you feel whatever it is you need to know." [1]
>>
>> Emotions deceive us because they can be misguided based on your
>> previous experience, for example in anxiety disorders or addiction:
>> "Your emotional system has no reason to lie, although it can be
>> misguided based on your previous experiences in the world that have
>> informed it." [1]
>>
>> Apparently emotions create a personal truth for each of us which
>> shows us the world as they (on behalf of our selfish genes) want us
>> to see it. A kind of personalized, distorted version of reality that
>> reflects the importance of each object based on our personal longings
>> and desires. Mary C. Lamia writes "nevertheless, your emotions will
>> tell you the truth - your truth - even if you don't want to listen." [1]
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/intense-emotions-and-strong-feelings/201208/do-emotions-lie
>>
>> [2]
>> https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/living-forward/202009/how-your-thinking-creates-your-reality
>>
>> -J.
>>
>> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -.
>> --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives: 5/2017 thru present
>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>> 1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>
>
> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives: 5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
> 1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20250509/093cb8a4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xD5BAF94F88AFFA63.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3118 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20250509/093cb8a4/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20250509/093cb8a4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Friam
mailing list