[FRIAM] Why the Mystery of Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought

steve smith sasmyth at swcp.com
Mon Jul 8 13:40:43 EDT 2024


I find this nicely referential to Jeff Hawkins (Palm Pilot, Redwood) 
SensoriMotor learning based in his (poorly named?) 1000 Brains theory 
and his (new to me) concept/project of applying those Neurological 
Models of the NeoCortex to developing AI.

    https://spectrum.ieee.org/jeff-hawkins

On a nearly orthogonal tangent referential to Dave's throwdown in 
haptics and VR:

    https://www.bhaptics.com/

Reminiscent of Haptek's *original* mission to provide VR haptic suits 
suitable for at least virtual combat sports if not military training.   
The founders include Chris and Robert Shaw (yes, of Chaos Cabal 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Shaw_(physicist)> fame) but they 
made an abrupt kink in their trajectory developing PeoplePutty for 
building lifelike VR Avatars.  Chris visited sfX a couple of times 
before *we* went defunct!

FWIW, Chris drew the image that was printed on the posters and T-shirts 
for the first Evolution, Games and Learning conference in Los Alamos 
(leading toward the ALife conferences) in roughly 1985 or 1986?  It was 
a human hand drawing a robot hand ala Escher. My T-shirt got repurposed 
into an art project by my partner in the 90s... I haven't seen it (or 
found an image of the drawing) in decades excepting for tripping over 
Steen's Son Leif visiting back from college at El Parasol in Pojoaque 
(10 years ago?) wearing Steen's copy of the shirt... surreal, no?

I thought PeoplePutty had gone totally defunct but it appears it evolved 
(or got folded) into character.ai which I have only followed one link 
deep... Chris is their Chief Creative Officer or somesuch.

Riffing or tangenting on DaveW's VR-Sex angle, many of us here may have 
tested or even owned a Novint Falcon device...   docking molecules and 
folding proteins was the killer app IMO.   Before they went totally out 
of business (theme here, VR businesses failing?) I tried to acquire a 
suite of them for a specific telecollaboration project and found that 
the production line had been bought out for over a year in the future.   
I probed around and found that there was a startup company adapting them 
for a "teledildonics" product aspiration.  I couldn't tell if they ever 
made it.  I'm guessing not, too absurd to imagine.


I think my aspirational project was well before this, but this DailyMail 
reference suggested the "dark" project went forward (or another took it up):

There was also a "pistol grip" used widely for first-person shooter 
games (a whole new twist on the bump-stock concept?)   The mechanism is 
basically a "stewart platform".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_platform

FriXion Cyber-Dildonics:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2908819/The-social-network-SEX-TOYS-New-network-aims-link-smart-toys-online-couples-play-together.html


And then there is the less prurient for teleHandholding:

    https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/396691740/frebble-hold-hands-online

Apt for COVID lockdown romances?

Mumble,

- Sieve



> long time ago, in the early days of "virtual reality" I consulted for 
> W Industries, a company in England that made full body suits with 
> thousands of tiny sensors and effectors for the purpose of cyber-sex. 
> They worked well enough but suffered from a "lack of resolution" just 
> as early CRT monitors. Unlike monitors, like Apple's Retina displays, 
> where the 'pixel density' could be increased sufficiently to be 
> convincing; the body suits would have had to have a "pixel' density" 
> several orders of magnitude greater than that required to build a 
> convincing display.
>
> davew
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, at 1:50 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>> Stephen,
>>
>> During the four years I worked at the Robotics Institute I worked on 
>> the Factory of the Future project. This involved sensors, including 
>> cameras, temperature sensors, viscosity, conductivity and whatever 
>> else was relevant.  Also actuators which controlled inputs to the 
>> different subprocesses in the manufacture of fluorescent light 
>> bulbs.  We implemented some subsystems related to automated 
>> inspection of coatings inside the bulbs but conceptually we designed 
>> the whole factory.  During that project Westinghouse sold all of its 
>> lightbulb manufacturing plants and IP to Phillips of the Netherlands 
>> and they stopped our work. The point is I am familiar with the 
>> concepts you mention.  Even if that project had resulted in a factory 
>> that could manufacture light bulbs with minimal human supervision it 
>> would not have occurred to me that there was any consciousness 
>> involved.  Intelligence yes.  As for embodied intelligence?  Sort of.
>>
>> Frank
>> ---
>> Frank C. Wimberly
>> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
>> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>>
>> 505 670-9918
>> Santa Fe, NM
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, 12:23 PM Stephen Guerin 
>> <stephen.guerin at simtable.com> wrote:
>>
>>     Frank,
>>
>>     embodied where? in our shared world? if it uses sensors and
>>     actuators like Marcus's Waymo that perceives him and hopefully
>>     acts to avoid him?
>>
>>     Consider the Simtable that uses structured light
>>     <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_light> in a
>>     perception-action loop (ala the neo-Gibsonians in ecological
>>     psychology) with the projector camera feedback to recover a
>>     dynamic 3D model of its world and watch with its camera for human
>>     interaction (laserpointers, object tracking etc) to trigger
>>     corresponding behaviors with the projector to interact with the
>>     user. Is it embodied?
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 12:08 PM Frank Wimberly
>>     <wimberly3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>         So you think of software running on a computer as being embodied?
>>
>>         ---
>>         Frank C. Wimberly
>>         140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
>>         Santa Fe, NM 87505
>>
>>         505 670-9918
>>         Santa Fe, NM
>>
>>         On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, 9:12 AM Nicholas Thompson
>>         <thompnickson2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>             I think of large language models as the most embodied
>>             things on the planet, but let that go for a moment.  Back
>>             to baby steps.
>>
>>             Can you lay out for me why you believe that language is
>>             essential to self-awareness.  Does that believe arise
>>             from ideology, authority, or some set of facts I need to
>>             take account of.  To be honest here, I should say where I
>>             am coming from.  A lot of my so-called career was spent
>>             railing against circular reasoning in evolutionary theory
>>             and psychology.  So, if language is essential to
>>             self-awareness, and animals do not have language, then it
>>             indeed follows that animals do not have self-awareness. 
>>             But what if our method for detecting self awareness
>>             requires language? Now we are in a loop.  Are we in such
>>             a loop, or are there facts of some matter, independent of
>>             language, convince you that animals are not self-aware. 
>>             Is self awareness extricable from language?
>>
>>             It is an old old trope that animals are automata but that
>>             humans have soul.  Descartes swore by it.  Is "language"
>>             the new soul?
>>
>>             Nick
>>
>>
>>
>>             On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 7:29 AM Jochen Fromm
>>             <jofr at cas-group.net> wrote:
>>
>>                 I would say cats, dogs and horses don't have
>>                 meta-awareness because they lack language. They live
>>                 in the present moment, in the here and now. Without
>>                 language they do not have the capability to reflect
>>                 on their past or to think about their future. They
>>                 can not formulate stories of themselves which could
>>                 help to form a sense of identity. Language is the
>>                 mirror in which we perceive ourselves during "this is
>>                 me" moments. Animals lack this mirror completely. One
>>                 dimensional scents trails do not count as language.
>>
>>                 Large languages models lack consciousness because
>>                 they do not have a body which is embedded as a actor
>>                 in an environment. These two things are necessary:
>>                 the physical world of bodies, and the mental world of
>>                 language. When both collide in the same spot we can
>>                 get consciousness.
>>
>>                 -J.
>>
>>
>>                 -------- Original message --------
>>                 From: Nicholas Thompson <thompnickson2 at gmail.com>
>>                 Date: 7/6/24 5:05 AM (GMT+01:00)
>>                 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
>>                 Group <friam at redfish.com>
>>                 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Why the Mystery of Consciousness
>>                 Is Deeper Than We Thought
>>
>>                 Well, that's because Socrates claimed not to know
>>                 what he thought, and since I genuinely don[t know
>>                 what I think until I work it out, the conversation
>>                 has the same quality.  I apologize for that.  my
>>                 students found it truly distressing.
>>
>>                 So, if you will indulge me, why don't you think your
>>                 cat has meta=awareness? Authority, ideology, or is
>>                 there some experience you have had that leads you to
>>                 think that.   It would be kind of odd if it she
>>                 didn't because animals have all sorts of ways of
>>                 distinguishing self from other. They have ways of
>>                 knowinng that "I did that".  (e.g., scent marking?)
>>
>>
>>                 On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 3:19 PM Jochen Fromm
>>                 <jofr at cas-group.net> wrote:
>>
>>                     Well yes, if meta-awareness is defined as acting
>>                     in response to one's own awareness then I would
>>                     say animals like a cat don't have it but humans
>>                     have. As an example I could say this almost feels
>>                     like I am a participant in a dialogue from Plato...
>>
>>                     I would be surprised if it can be described in
>>                     simple terms. If the essence of consciousness is
>>                     subjective experience then it is indeed hard to
>>                     describe by a theory although there are many
>>                     attempts. Persons who perceive things differently
>>                     are wired differently. And what is more
>>                     subjective than the perception of oneself?
>>
>>                     https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/what-is-consciousness/
>>
>>
>>                     If we can describe it mathematically then
>>                     probably as a way an information feels if it is
>>                     processed in complex ways, ad infinitum like the
>>                     orbits of a strange attractor.
>>
>>                     https://chaoticatmospheres.com/mathrules-strange-attractors
>>
>>
>>                     -J.
>>
>>
>>
>>                     -------- Original message --------
>>                     From: Nicholas Thompson <thompnickson2 at gmail.com>
>>                     Date: 7/5/24 6:56 PM (GMT+01:00)
>>                     To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
>>                     Group <friam at redfish.com>
>>                     Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Why the Mystery of
>>                     Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought
>>
>>                     ,
>>
>>                     Great!  Baby steps. "If we aren't moving slowly,
>>                     we aren't moving." So, can I define some new
>>                     terms, tentatively, /per explorandum/ ? Let's
>>                     call acting-in-respect-to-the-world, "awareness".
>>                       Allowing this definition, we certainly seem to
>>                     agree that the cat is aware.  Lets define
>>                     meta-awareness as acting i respect to one's own
>>                     awareness. Now, am I correct in assuming that you
>>                     identify meta-awareness with consciousness and
>>                     that you think that the cat is not meta-aware and
>>                     that I probably am?  And further that you think
>>                     that meta-awareness requires consciousness?
>>
>>                     Nick
>>
>>                     On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 12:17 PM Jochen Fromm
>>                     <jofr at cas-group.net> wrote:
>>
>>                         I would say a cat is conscious in the sense
>>                         that it is aware of its immediate
>>                         environment. Cats are nocturnal animals who
>>                         hunt at night and mostly sleep during the
>>                         day. Consciousness in the sense of being
>>                         aware of oneself as an actor in an
>>                         environment requires understanding of
>>                         language which only humans have ( and LLMs now )
>>                         https://www.quantamagazine.org/insects-and-other-animals-have-consciousness-experts-declare-20240419/
>>
>>                         -J.
>>
>>
>>                         -------- Original message --------
>>                         From: Nicholas Thompson <thompnickson2 at gmail.com>
>>                         Date: 7/5/24 5:02 AM (GMT+01:00)
>>                         To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
>>                         Coffee Group <friam at redfish.com>
>>                         Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Why the Mystery of
>>                         Consciousness Is Deeper Than We Thought
>>
>>                         Jochen,
>>
>>                         /I think the first step in any conversation
>>                         is to decide whether your cat is conscious. 
>>                         If so, why do you think so; if not,
>>                         likewise.  I had a facinnationg conversation
>>                         with  GBT about  whether he was conscious and
>>                         he denied it "hotly", which, of course, met
>>                         one of his criteria for consciousness. /
>>
>>                         /So.  Is your cat connscious?/
>>
>>                         /Nick/
>>
>>                         On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 7:26 PM Jochen Fromm
>>                         <jofr at cas-group.net> wrote:
>>
>>                             I don't get Philip Goff: first we send
>>                             our children 20 years to school, from
>>                             Kindergarten to college and university,
>>                             to teach them all kinds of languages, and
>>                             then we wonder how they can be conscious.
>>                             It will be the same for AI: first we
>>                             spend millions and millions to train them
>>                             all available knowledge, and then we
>>                             wonder how they can develop understanding
>>                             of language and consciousness...
>>                             https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-mystery-of-consciousness-is-deeper-than-we-thought/
>>
>>                             -J.
>>
>>                             -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- ---
>>                             .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>>                             FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>                             Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /
>>                              Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>>                             https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>                             to (un)subscribe
>>                             http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>                             FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>                             archives:  5/2017 thru present
>>                             https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>                               1/2003 thru 6/2021
>>                             http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>>                         -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-.
>>                         ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>>                         FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>                         Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   / 
>>                          Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>>                         https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>                         to (un)subscribe
>>                         http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>                         FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>                         archives:  5/2017 thru present
>>                         https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>                           1/2003 thru 6/2021
>>                         http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>>                     -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... .
>>                     / -.-. --- -.. .
>>                     FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>                     Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   / 
>>                      Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>                     to (un)subscribe
>>                     http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>                     FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>                     archives:  5/2017 thru present
>>                     https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>                       1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>>                 -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . /
>>                 -.-. --- -.. .
>>                 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>                 Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /  Thursdays
>>                 9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>                 to (un)subscribe
>>                 http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>                 FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>                 archives:  5/2017 thru present
>>                 https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>                   1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>>             -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-.
>>             --- -.. .
>>             FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>             Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /  Thursdays
>>             9a-12p Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>             to (un)subscribe
>>             http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>             FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>             archives:  5/2017 thru present
>>             https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>               1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>>         -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. ---
>>         -.. .
>>         FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>         Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /  Thursdays 9a-12p
>>         Zoom https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>         to (un)subscribe
>>         http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>         FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>         archives:  5/2017 thru present
>>         https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>           1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>>     -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>>     FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>     Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
>>     https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>     to (un)subscribe
>>     http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>     FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>     archives:  5/2017 thru present
>>     https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>       1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>   1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>
>
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>    1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/attachments/20240708/4b45aaa4/attachment.html>


More information about the Friam mailing list